Speed Endurance of the 200m
The Scientific Approach to Sustaining Velocity Through the Final Stretch
DEEP DIVE
Every coach sees it – athletes flying through 100 meters, then watching their mechanics break down over the final stretch. This breakdown isn't just a conditioning issue – it's a speed endurance challenge.
Research by Haugen and colleagues confirms what coaches observe – maintaining speed under fatigue is a trainable quality that responds to specific approaches.
Let's examine what's happening physiologically and how to address it effectively.
The Four Physiological Barriers
When you're working to maintain speed in the final stretch, four distinct challenges emerge:
1. Metabolic Acidosis
Near-maximum sprinting floods your muscles with hydrogen ions from anaerobic metabolism. These ions interfere with the contractile mechanism that generates force during each ground contact. A study by Sahlin demonstrated how this acid accumulation affects muscle contraction timing and power.
2. Neuromuscular Fatigue
Your central nervous system can only maintain optimal firing patterns for a limited time. Ground contact times increase by 15-20% in the final phase, meaning more time on the ground and less time projecting forward.
3. Mechanical Breakdown
High-speed video of championship finals shows a pattern – athletes who fade display subtle technical flaws first. Hip height drops, knee drive diminishes, and foot contacts become passive rather than aggressive.
4. Fiber-Specific Exhaustion
Fast-twitch fibers that provide explosive power are the first to exhaust when fatigue builds. As phosphocreatine stores deplete, your capacity for explosive force diminishes rapidly.
The good news is that these limitations can be addressed with targeted training.
Effective Training Methods
There are five approaches that consistently produce results:
1. Specific Speed Endurance Intervals
When improving speed maintenance, session quality is more important than quantity.

For 100-200m specialists, these protocols align with research findings:
2-3 sets of 120-150m at 95-98% effort with 8-10 minutes between reps
3×80m acceleration + 1×150m (4-5 min rest between 80s, then straight to the 150)
4×150m at 90-95% with 6-8 minutes recovery
The critical factor is sufficient rest intervals to maintain quality throughout the session.

Comparing these tables illustrates a fundamental principle: Table 3.1 provides 7-10 minutes between flying efforts, while Table 3.2 cuts this to just 4 minutes. The extra recovery makes all the difference in maintaining quality.
2. Split-Run Training
Breaking longer sprints into segments with brief rest periods allows athletes to accumulate race-specific loading while maintaining technical excellence. For example, rather than a continuous 300m sprint, try 2×150m with 30-60 seconds of light jogging between.
This approach forces adaptation without the complete technique breakdown that often occurs in longer continuous sprints. It's essentially interval training specifically designed for fast-twitch fibers.
3. Speed Reserve Development
Looking at Table 3.1, you'll notice the progressive buildup of flying sprints – starting with 20m, then 30m, and finishing with 40m efforts. This methodical approach to maximum velocity work creates a bigger "speed ceiling."
When your top speed increases from 10.5 to 11.0 m/s, maintaining 95% becomes significantly easier. Athletes transform their race profile by dedicating one session per week to pure speed development with full recovery between efforts.
4. Technique Under Fatigue
The warm-up section in both tables includes technical elements (hurdle walk-overs, A-skips) that establish proper mechanical patterns. The key is maintaining these patterns when fatigue sets in.
Integrate technique work after hard sprint efforts. After a challenging 150m run, immediately perform 4-6 bounds focusing on posture and front-side mechanics. This trains your neuromuscular system to maintain proper positions even as fatigue accumulates.
5. Metabolic Buffering Enhancement
Sahlin's research demonstrates that specific training can improve your body's ability to buffer acid accumulation. These adaptations include increased carnosine content and enhanced bicarbonate handling within muscle fibers.
Sessions like 2 sets of 4×200m with 30s rest between reps and 8 minutes between sets create the metabolic environment that enhances hydrogen ion buffering. Your muscles adapt to tolerate higher levels of acidosis without performance decline.
Programming for Peak Speed Endurance
We can organize speed endurance development into three distinct phases:
Early Season (Build Phase)
Focus on developing raw materials: absolute strength, technical efficiency, and aerobic capacity through:
Lower intensity tempo runs (60-70% effort)
Technical drills without significant fatigue
Extensive strength development
Limited specific speed endurance work
Pre-Competition Phase
As races approach, shift toward more specific endurance:
Increase intensity of runs to 80-90% effort
Introduce specific speed endurance intervals (described above)
Reduce overall volume while maintaining intensity
Integrate more race modeling sessions
Competition Phase
Maintain what you've built with precision:
Full recovery between all high-intensity sessions (48-72 hours minimum)
Reduced volume but maintained intensity (fewer reps, same quality)
Strategic use of time trials that mimic competition demands
Careful monitoring of fatigue markers to prevent overtraining
Table 3.1 demonstrates this principle in action – relatively low volume (just 3 reps per section) but substantial rest periods (3-10 minutes) that allow complete neuromuscular recovery between efforts.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Three critical errors repeatedly appear in speed endurance training:
1. The Volume Trap
Many athletes accumulate excessive sprint volume that compromises quality. Table 3.2 illustrates this – similar volume to Table 3.1 but with inadequate rest periods, resulting in declining performance across reps (notice the times getting slower).
2. The Tempo Confusion
While submaximal "tempo" runs have value, they aren't a substitute for true speed endurance work. Real adaptation requires sessions at 90-100% intensity that challenge your race-specific energy systems.
3. The Recovery Failure
The nervous system needs 48-72 hours to recover from high-intensity sprint work. Scheduling speed endurance sessions too close together results in reduced performance and increased injury risk.
Practical Application
A well-designed two-week block for mid-season might look like:
Monday: Acceleration focus (short sprints from blocks)
Wednesday: Maximum velocity (flying 30s)
Friday: Speed endurance (150m repeats at 95%)
Monday: Technique emphasis (drills and short accelerations)
Wednesday: Speed-strength (plyometrics and short sprints)
Friday: Race modeling (specific endurance to competition distance)
Between these high-intensity days, include active recovery that promotes blood flow without creating additional fatigue. This framework is used by athletes who consistently maintain form through championship finals.

Reply